Wednesday, November 28, 2012

my books - Team of Rivals: The Political Genius of Abraham Lincoln (2005) by Doris Kearns Goodwin

Wiki notes:
Team of Rivals: The Political Genius of Abraham Lincoln is a book by historian Doris Kearns Goodwin published in 2005. The book is a biographical portrait of U.S. President Abraham Lincoln and some of the men who served with him in his Cabinet from 1861 to 1865. Three of his Cabinet members had previously run against Lincoln in the 1860 election: Attorney General Edward Bates, Secretary of the Treasury Salmon P. Chase and Secretary of State William H. Seward. The book focuses on Lincoln's mostly successful attempts to reconcile conflicting personalities and political factions on the path to abolition and victory in the US Civil War.

While consulting on a Steven Spielberg project in 1999, Goodwin told Spielberg she was planning to write Team of Rivals, and Spielberg immediately told her he wanted the film rights. DreamWorks finalized the deal in 2001 and the film has been in pre-production since. Daniel Day-Lewis agreed to play Abraham Lincoln after Liam Neeson withdrew from the project in 2010 after being attached from the start; with Sally Field playing Mary Todd Lincoln. The screenplay was written by Tony Kushner. Filming began on October 17, 2011, and ended on December 19, 2011. The film will be released nationwide on November 16, 2012.


Yes, that is right, I read a contemporary (2005) book!
And it is a nonfiction book (to boot)!
But, yes, the topic is truly classic.


I read the book; have not yet seen the movie.
Oldest and husband saw it and said it was excellent.
The movie is much narrower in scope than the book.


This book was a daunting task, 36 discs/42 hours.  That is about 70 minutes per disc.


I tried to think of the longest book I have read recently. Bleak House (Dickens) came to mind. I looked it up and it was 29 discs at 33 hours.  

I tried to pace myself at two discs per day, 7 days a week. That is 140 minutes per day. Between driving, housework, waiting, shopping, I have 140 minutes most days. No, it didn't happen EVERY single day, because Thanksgiving was in there, but it did happen almost every day. And a couple days I had time for more than 2 discs. So, I finished in about 20 days.

That is a long time, for me, on the same book. But that is also pretty quick work for this volume. I ran into another woman who read it, and she said it took her three full weeks (also) of very concentrated effort. So she and I were pretty much at the same pace.



I have always been interested in Lincoln. I have visited (I think) all of his memorial sites in Indiana, Illinois, Kentucky, Washington DC. I would not say Lincoln is a hobby of mine.

But I probably read all the Lincoln books on the shelf when I was in 6th grade and read the whole biography/autobiography section of the school library. I think I remember reading Lincoln (1985) by Gore Vidal, but that book is actually historical fiction. 

I was a little worried Team of Rivals was going to read like a history text book. It does not read like a text. Yes there is a LOT of data in it. The book is written so all the data is interesting and there is a definite story. The data is woven well.

The first four discs alternate between introducing Edward Bates, Salmon P. Chase, William H. Seward, and Abraham Lincoln. This section of the book talks about all four of these families, how these men were raised, educated, wedded, established. There is a nice amount of information on these men's wives and children and households. The reader is given an interesting overview.

Lincoln's childhood is given as a very brief overview. More time is spent on his early adult years. And then the book really dives into his law practice, his start in politics, his presidential run and the presidency itself (which is all about the Civil War).

Slightly more information is given on Lincoln (vs the other three men on the team) as the book progresses. But not by much. The topic is the TEAM, not Lincoln as an individual.

I thought this was an excellent book. Even though there are a lot of characters and data, Goodwin did a good job in staying focused and writing an interwoven story.

I knew much of the Lincoln history. But I did not know most of the cabinet history.

Goodwin referenced her sources in a friendly, conversational way all the way through the book. An example is "in a letter to her father, Kate wrote . . .".

I also loved her asides to the modern reader. When she talked about Lincoln sleeping with his roommates, she explained how that was typical in that time frame and why she did not think there was anything sexual in it from their writings/records of the time. In other words, she knew that was where our minds were going to go, and she answered it.



PS -
My husband is going to listen to this book next. He has listened to a lot of other non-fiction that he really enjoyed. As I talked about this book (no spoiler worries in reading historical books!) as I read, he kept asking me what year? and I never knew. So, I think he reads with a historical calendar in mind, and obviously I do not. 

Wednesday, November 21, 2012

My books - The Grapes of Wrath (1939) by John Steinbeck

Wiki notes:
The Grapes of Wrath is an American realist novel written by John Steinbeck and published in 1939. For it he won the annual National Book Award and Pulitzer Prize for novels and it was cited prominently when he won the Nobel Prize in 1962.


Steinbeck is the oldest's favorite author.

I think East of Eden (1952) and Grapes of Wrath occupy spots one and two in his all time favorite books.

If you are trying to remember the other Steinbeck book I read earlier in the year, it was the novella Of Mice and Men (1937).

As soon as I have a little break in my book deadlines, I am going to read East of Eden. Honestly it is pretty ridiculous that I am 51, college educated, and have not read it.


Wiki notes:
The Grapes of Wrath is a 1940 drama film directed by John Ford. It was based on John Steinbeck's Pulitzer Prize-winning novel of the same name. The screenplay was written by Nunnally Johnson and the executive producer was Darryl F. Zanuck.
Cast:
Henry Fonda as Tom Joad.
Henry Fonda as Tom Joad
Russell Simpson as Pa Joad
Jane Darwell as Ma Joad
John Carradine as Jim Casy, former preacher
Charley Grapewin as Grandpa William James Joad
Zeffie Tilbury as Grandma Joad
Frank Darien as Uncle John Joad
Dorris Bowdon as Rose-of-Sharon "Rosasharn" Rivers
O.Z. Whitehead as Al Joad
Frank Sully as Noah Joad
Darryl Hickman as Winfield Joad
Shirley Mills as Ruthie Joad
Eddie Quillan as Connie Rivers, husband of Rosasharn
John Qualen as Muley Graves, neighbor in Oklahoma
Roger Imhof as Mr. Thomas, ditch employer
Grant Mitchell as Manager of government camp
Charles D. Brown as Wilkie, boy lookout at dance
John Arledge as Davis, bulldozer driver
Ward Bond as Friendly Policeman, Bakersfield
Eddie Waller as Proprietor
Max Wagner as Guard
(Darryl Hickman is the last surviving cast member.)


I can 100% understand why this book, The Grapes of Wrath, won a Pulitzer.

Steinbeck captured an era. And it is a gut wrenching, no one wanted to talk about it, part of history. I wonder, without this book, if generations would understand why some of the laws (minimum wage, working conditions, child labor, etc) are so important.

I also wondered, as I read, how different things are for illegal, migrant workers and their families in the south/west today.

If you are not familiar with this part of history on Oklahoma and then in turn, California, the Context section from SparkNotes gives a very good, short overview without giving away the book.


I did have the "just get there already" sentiment through the middle of Grapes.

And at one point I thought - Mr. Steinbeck, did you feel you needed to clean house on your number of characters?

But those feelings were just for part of the middle, the story re-emerged (with a lot less characters!).

And I had a driveway moment for the last several chapters. I sort of cleared the decks, put my ear buds in, and listened all the way to the end.

I was (quite) startled at the abrupt ending.

But then as I thought about it, there was no way to slowly end it or wrap up the story lines. Their lives were sort of a never ending struggle. There wasn't going to be a magic solution or a nice tidy package.

I knew this was a sad story, oldest warned me.
It always amuses me that for many of things I read, at least one of my kids has read it. And honestly for these types of books, I like to KNOW before I start them. I am not saying I want a spoiler. I am saying I want to be told - sad, tragedy, really stupid people, etc.

And when I finished this book, oldest and I talked about it for a long time.

How great is that?


As I read, I thought of Uncle Tom's Cabin quite a bit. It is not the same story line, but the social context was there and both books were written to further social awareness, capture an era.

So, yes, very glad I read Grapes of Wrath. It was darned well about time for this one too.

I have been seeing parallels of the social issues all over the place and have noticed many references to the book just in the few weeks since I read it.

Isn't amazing how often that happens with a topic?


Friday, November 09, 2012

American Film Institutes (AFI) Movie Lists

Youngest has been watching movies by category and by actor. She worked her way through some of the musical section of DVD's at the library. This was things like Oklahoma, South Pacific, Singing in the Rain. In the past she has worked her way through much of Barbra Streisand. She loves Audrey Hepburn. Sometimes she works on an era like When Harry Met Sally, Pretty in Pink, etc. She doesn't work exclusively through a whole set. She does a bit here, a bit there. She has been working through the classic movies on Netflix.





I found these movie lists and thought you might enjoy them.

Most of the links below list 100 of the best movies under that theme.

The top actors list does not include movie titles, but looking for movies with those actors would be a whole additional list.

Very good project for winter.

I do not snack in front of the TV.

I only watch TV at night, as part of my settling down ritual, when I am done with food for the day.






The year in front of the category does not mean the movies are from that year. It refers to the year the list was published. 

    Wednesday, November 07, 2012

    My books - The Age of Innocence (1920) Edith Wharton

    The Age of Innocence is Edith Wharton's 12th novel, which won the 1921 Pulitzer Prize.


    Wiki notes:
    The Age of Innocence centers on an upper-class couple's marriage. (Note: part one is pre marriage, part two is while they are married). Though the novel questions the assumptions and morals of 1870s' New York society, it never devolves into an outright condemnation of the institution. In fact, Wharton considered this novel an "apology" for her earlier, more brutal and critical novel, The House of Mirth. Not to be overlooked is Wharton's attention to detailing the charms and customs of the upper caste. The novel is lauded for its accurate portrayal of how the 19th-century East Coast American upper class lived, and this, combined with the social tragedy, earned Wharton a Pulitzer Prize — the first Pulitzer awarded to a woman. Edith Wharton was 58 years old at publication; she lived in that world, and saw it change dramatically by the end of World War I. The title is an ironic comment on the polished outward manners of New York society, when compared to its inward machinations.


     SparkNotes Context Section includes:
    It is believed that the expression "keeping up with the Joneses" once specifically referred to Edith Jones Wharton's parents, who were known throughout New York for their lavish social gatherings.

    I had a hard time getting into this book. Not sure why. I understood it. Just was not really invested in the first half. I had a couple thoughts that it might have been a bit to much like Emma or Room with a View. (Although I read Dracula  and another book after those two and immediately before The Age of Innocence.)

    LOVED the second half.

    Truly treasured the last several chapters.


    The protagonist is a man. So that made it different than Emma and a Room with a View. 

    I thought about men in general as I read this book.

    Men who are stand up men, and men who are not.

    Men who are loyal to their children and the mother of their children, and men who are not.

    I also thought of the men who jump from woman to woman.

    I also thought of breeding/class and education.

    I thought of whether you marry a boyfriend or a husband. 

    I thought of looking at the whole picture of your life and the stability and foundation of your family.